- Our Work
- Wild Places
- How You Can Help
- Become a Defender
- Ways to Give
- Adopt an Animal
- Gifts & Gear
- Take Action
- Attend an Event
- Hold Congress Accountable
- Explore Wildlife Stories
Organizations urge Senate to oppose endangered species exemptions
WASHINGTON, D.C. (06/09/2011) -
Alaska Wilderness League
Twenty-nine organizations, including both national and local environmental groups and scientific associations, have sent a letter asking the U.S. Senate to oppose amendments to the Economic Development Administration reauthorization bill that would exempt certain imperiled species from the Endangered Species Act. The letter is in reaction to the introduction of two amendments this week, one from Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) and one from Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), that would set a dangerous and sweeping precedent by amending the Endangered Species Act to block protections for the sand dune lizard and lesser prairie chicken, respectively.
The following is the text of the letter to the U.S. Senate signed by the 29 groups:
June 9, 2011
OPPOSE THE CORNYN AND INHOFE AMENDMENTS TO UNDERMINE THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (Cornyn 397 and Inhofe 429)
On behalf of our undersigned organizations and the millions of Americans we represent, we are writing to urge you to oppose Amendments #397 proposed by Senator John Cornyn, #429 proposed by Senator James Inhofe, and any similar amendments to S. 782, the Economic Revitalization Act of 2011. These amendments would prohibit protection of the dunes sagebrush lizard and the lesser prairie chicken under the Endangered Species Act. These extreme and unnecessary amendments should be opposed broadly because they set a dangerous precedent for the Endangered Species Act and specifically because these animals are in desperate need of protection.
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is one of the most visionary conservation laws ever enacted. When it was passed by Congress nearly 40 years ago, this nation made a historic commitment to save all species, no matter how great or small, from the irreparable loss of extinction. In so doing, Congress also was serving humanity – to protect an imperiled species, its habitat also must be protected, in turn protecting healthy natural systems that provide us with clean water, clean air, food, medicines and other products we all need to live healthy lives. These amendments violate the very spirit and purpose of the ESA by singling out individual species one by one and barring them from ever being protected under the Act, based entirely on political considerations rather than on the fundamental scientific principles that have served our nation so well for decades.
Both the dunes sagebrush lizard and the lesser prairie chicken are in dire need of protection. Both have the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listing priority number of 2 out of 12, meaning they face severe and immediate threats. The dunes sagebrush lizard has been a candidate for protection since 2001 and the lesser prairie chicken since 1998. The Fish and Wildlife Service has taken significant steps to protect these species as candidates and avert the need for listing, but the efforts thus far have failed to shield both from their greatest threat – loss of habitat. And while proponents of these amendments are advancing the view that listing a species under the ESA is a death knell for local economies, in reality, the ESA is one of America’s most flexible environmental laws, providing many exceptions and alternatives that allow economic growth while continuing to protect America’s wildlife heritage.
Our organizations opposed a provision included in the final FY 2011 Continuing Resolution that legislatively delisted wolves in the Northern Rockies. However, these amendments would establish a new and sweeping precedent that is even more dangerous, by actually amending the ESA to exclude particular species on the brink of extinction from ever receiving protection based not on science but on political calculations. These efforts represent an extreme anti-environmental agenda unworthy of our nation’s great environmental legacy. We urge you to oppose these and any similar amendments.
Thank you for your attention.
Alaska Wilderness League
American Bird Conservancy
Center for Biological Diversity
Center for Native Ecosystems
Conservation Law Foundation
Defenders of Wildlife
Ecological Society of America
Endangered Species Coalition
International Fund for Animal Welfare
League of Conservation Voters
National Audubon Society
Natural Resources Defense Council
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility
RESTORE: The North Woods
Save Our Wild Salmon Coalition
Sea Turtle Conservancy
Society for Conservation Biology
The Center for Plant Conservation
The Humane Society of the United States
The Wilderness Society
Union of Concerned Scientists
Western Nebraska Resources Council
World Wildlife Fund”
Contact(s):John Motsinger, 202-772-0288